{"id":85,"date":"2018-11-16T17:17:02","date_gmt":"2018-11-16T16:17:02","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/automates-stanislas.strony.uw.edu.pl\/?page_id=85"},"modified":"2019-06-03T22:44:13","modified_gmt":"2019-06-03T20:44:13","slug":"le-rocher","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"http:\/\/automates-stanislas.strony.uw.edu.pl\/en\/le-rocher\/","title":{"rendered":"Le Rocher"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>No other work of art funded by Stanislas Leszczy\u0144ski to his Lorraine palaces and gardens could be deemed equal to the <em>Rocher<\/em>, a spectacular mechanical theatre built by the king\u2019s close collaborator and trusted architect, Emmanuel H\u00e9r\u00e9, and Parisian clock-maker and engineer Fran\u00e7ois Richard. The two\u2013problably supervised by Leszczy\u0144ski himself\u2013created a remarkable and unique construction.<\/p>\n<p>Built into the northern terrace of the Lun\u00e9ville <em>ch\u00e2teau<\/em>, the <em>Rocher<\/em> measured 250 metres in length, and was positioned at the cruciform end of the canal created by closing the flow of the nearby river Vezouse with a lock: the water from the canal propelled the 88 (originally 86) automatic life-size sculptures of people and animals which decorated the vast rural and mountainous landscape of the <em>Rocher<\/em>. Scattered houses, bushes, trees, and rocks appeared in the diorama, and it was from the rocks (<em>rochers<\/em> in French) that it took its name. <\/p>\n<p>The mechanical sculptures designed by H\u00e9r\u00e9 Richard for the installation depicted a variety of genre and pastoral scenes: millers operating an artificial windmill, a shepherd herding his flock, a man playing a flute, a woodcutter, a drunkard with a bottle in his hand, a maid pouring water on the drunkard\u2019s head, a boy feeding a monkey with an apple, and a hermit beating his chest in a grotto, and many more.<\/p>\n<p>All of the scenes mentioned above were segments of the same picturesque landscape: it could be admired from either the canal side (while strolling or standing on a boat), or from a <em>loggia<\/em> located on the rightmost end of the composition. Leszczy\u0144ski\u2019s guests, who used the <em>loggia<\/em>, immediately became parts of the artwork, living actors joining the sculptures and taking part in the theatre of automata. <\/p>\n<p>H\u00e9r\u00e9, the author of the most detailed description of the <em>Rocher<\/em>, wrote in a boastful manner that the automata\u2019s movements were \u2018so well imitated that they did not seem to be works of art at all\u2019. P. Bertier went one step further than H\u00e9r\u00e9 and praised the construction in such words: \u2018this piece was one of the most singular works that art had ever undertaken and executed. If the ancients admired the machines of Ctesibius of Alexandria, whose only power was limited to forcing wood and bronze to make some noises by the means of water and air, what would they have thought of this <em>Rocher<\/em>, where 66 life-size figures perform different movements, and deceive the ears and the eyes. . .?\u2019.<\/p>\n<p>Ctesibius, the ancient automata-maker mentioned by Bertier, was one of the first creator of such works in Europe, the other being the famous Hero of Alexandria. The arts of automatica and pneumatica thrived in the continent especially in the sixteenth century, when they were revived by the discoveries of Italian humanists, always eager to recover lost and obscure ancient treatises. The first printed versions of Hero\u2019s works followed shortly afterwards. Popular garden decorations, automata were since then present in many European palaces and villas, Pratolino (Italy) Saint-Germain-en-Laye (France), and Hellbrunn (Austria) among them. <\/p>\n<p>Meanwhile, automata attracted the scientific attention of philosophers and anatomists for whom they were a chance to better render\u2013or even replicate\u2013the construction of the human and animal bodies. The legend has it that Descartes himself was in possession of an automaton, and many eighteenth-century intellectuals approached these mechanical inventions enthusiastically, as they dreamed of creating a new artificial man. Leszczy\u0144ski\u2019s <em>Rocher<\/em> had no such purpose. It was, rather, a garden toy, an object of entertainment created to amuse and astonish the king\u2019s guests. And although it was made in the eighteenth century, when new scientific ideas transformed the way the human body was conceived and portrayed, the <em>Rocher<\/em> built upon a much older artistic tradition.<\/p>\n<p>Eventually, after the death of Stanis\u0142aw Leszczy\u0144ski in 1766 and the incorporation of the Duchy of Lorraine into the Kingdom of France, the entire Lun\u00e9ville <em>ch\u00e2teau<\/em> was turned into barracks, and the <em>Rocher<\/em> dismantled, with all its pieces dispersed or sold.<br \/>\n<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>No other work of art funded by Stanislas Leszczy\u0144ski to his Lorraine palaces and gardens could be deemed equal to the Rocher, a spectacular mechanical theatre built by the king\u2019s close collaborator and trusted architect, Emmanuel H\u00e9r\u00e9, and Parisian clock-maker and engineer Fran\u00e7ois Richard. The two\u2013problably supervised by Leszczy\u0144ski himself\u2013created a remarkable and unique construction. &hellip; <\/p>\n<p class=\"link-more\"><a href=\"http:\/\/automates-stanislas.strony.uw.edu.pl\/en\/le-rocher\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;Le Rocher&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":924,"featured_media":122,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"_links_to":"","_links_to_target":""},"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/automates-stanislas.strony.uw.edu.pl\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/85"}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/automates-stanislas.strony.uw.edu.pl\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/automates-stanislas.strony.uw.edu.pl\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/automates-stanislas.strony.uw.edu.pl\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/924"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/automates-stanislas.strony.uw.edu.pl\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=85"}],"version-history":[{"count":13,"href":"http:\/\/automates-stanislas.strony.uw.edu.pl\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/85\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":246,"href":"http:\/\/automates-stanislas.strony.uw.edu.pl\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/85\/revisions\/246"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/automates-stanislas.strony.uw.edu.pl\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/122"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/automates-stanislas.strony.uw.edu.pl\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=85"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}